← All comparisons
Atlas Control vs Atera
Atera prices per technician with unlimited endpoints. Atlas prices per user with every module included. The comparison is mostly about where your costs actually sit.
The short answer
Atera’s per-technician model is hard to beat if you have few technicians and many endpoints, and its RMM is more mature than ours. Atlas makes more sense if your work is as much commercial as technical — quoting, procurement, billing, contracts — because those are included rather than adjacent.
Where Atlas is the better fit
- Quoting, procurement, supplier catalogues and margin control are first-class, not add-ons.
- Accounting, direct debit and GST built for Australian billing.
- Client-facing store, portal and branded documents included.
- HR, compliance and offboarding modules in the same product.
Where Atera is the better fit
- A more mature RMM, with a longer track record on patching at scale.
- Per-technician pricing is cheaper for a small team running many endpoints.
- Larger integration catalogue and a bigger support organisation.
- Established AI features with real usage behind them.
Check these yourself
Competitor facts go stale, and we are not a neutral source. Confirm these before you decide either way:
- Count your technicians against your billable users — the two pricing models diverge sharply.
- Whether you need the commercial modules at all. If you only want RMM, you are paying for things you will not open.
Atlas Control, plainly
- Pricing
- A$329 per user per month, GST included. One plan, every module, unlimited clients and endpoints.
- Trial
- Three months free, then six months at 50%.
- Origin
- Built by an Australian MSP for its own use, then opened up.
- Size
- Small and young. You will talk to the people who write the code.